Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 27 Jun 2003 11:37:17 +0300
From:      Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net>
To:        Soeren Straarup <xride@x12.dk>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: replacing sendmail with qmail
Message-ID:  <20030627083716.GK347@straylight.oblivion.bg>
In-Reply-To: <20030627093018.C44932-100000@x12.dk>
References:  <oprrd276m18ckrg5@smtp.central.cox.net> <20030627093018.C44932-100000@x12.dk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--hOcCNbCCxyk/YU74
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 09:39:36AM +0200, Soeren Straarup wrote:
>=20
> Well my point is that every one (that is interrested in security) knows
> that Sendmail and bind and so on have their exploits..
>=20
> And I like that they are the one that is comming with some more or less
> insecure services, this is due to that it really gives ppl the freedom
> choose the services that they want to use. But the generic ones works for
> home networks with no external access too.
>=20
> Freedom of religion.
>=20
> Well with freedom comes responsibility.

And this responsibility is handled excellently by the FreeBSD Security
Officer team and the FreeBSD sendmail maintainer, George Shapiro.
I don't think that there would be a better way to handle the existing
and published Sendmail vulnerabilities than the current practice of
timely patches and updates to both -current, -stable, *and* the various
security branches, so that everyone tracking the security advisories is
aware of the need to update, and update *now*, as soon as there is
actually something to update to.  Great job, folks!

With that said, you could always do what I do and cut your own releases
with appropriate NO_* knobs in make.conf ;)  This is *not* to say that I
don't trust the security officer team and the maintainers of the various
pieces of contributed software that I exclude from my own builds; it's
just a matter of personal preference.

Here's hoping this is the last post in this thread :)  (The last word?
Me?  Naah, that's just lack of morning coffee getting to you :P )

G'luck,
Peter

--=20
Peter Pentchev	roam@ringlet.net    roam@sbnd.net    roam@FreeBSD.org
PGP key:	http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc
Key fingerprint	FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E  DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553
This sentence was in the past tense.

--hOcCNbCCxyk/YU74
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE+/AI87Ri2jRYZRVMRAs51AKCQ6ONmy3dJ2KQl89XEceFqgyKOSACfSVRT
IxzKd5IjVjePTbYKbJX18UA=
=DRQd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--hOcCNbCCxyk/YU74--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030627083716.GK347>