Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2003 03:16:12 +0200 From: Clement Laforet <sheepkiller@cultdeadsheep.org> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: current state of the art / best practice for devfs in a jail ? Message-ID: <20030706031612.07fcc01a.sheepkiller@cultdeadsheep.org> In-Reply-To: <20030705163426.GO70590@roark.gnf.org> References: <20030703173035.GH86503@webserver.get-linux.org> <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1030703220654.31430A-100000@fledge.watson.org> <20030705163426.GO70590@roark.gnf.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 5 Jul 2003 09:34:26 -0700 Gordon Tetlow <gordont@gnf.org> wrote: > No, that wasn't me. If I had to guess it was either mtm@ or mike@ (or > maybe some other Mike in the project). Mike Makonnen (mtm@) commited a slightly modified version of my script. Jail support is quite rudimentary. since I didn't give him any feedback about "the next version I planned" (short of time and I focused on jailctl utility), he did the commit. Scot W. Hetzel made very impressive enhancements to it (including devfs handling): http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2003-April/001203.html Regards, clem
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030706031612.07fcc01a.sheepkiller>