Date: 08 Jul 2003 09:57:14 +1000 From: Andrew Thomson <ajthomson@optushome.com.au> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: spamassassin slow to process messages Message-ID: <1057622233.52026.38.camel@athomson.prv.au.itouchnet.net> In-Reply-To: <20030707233726.GA74181@wopr.caltech.edu> References: <1057619317.52026.28.camel@athomson.prv.au.itouchnet.net> <20030707233726.GA74181@wopr.caltech.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 2003-07-08 at 09:37, Matthew Hunt wrote: > On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 09:08:37AM +1000, Andrew Thomson wrote: > > > I've got a CPU: Pentium III/Pentium III Xeon/Celeron (930.32-MHz > > 686-class CPU) and I'm seeing performance like, > > > > Jul 8 08:25:11 athomson spamd[52016]: clean message (0.4/5.0) for > > ajt:1001 in 10.2 seconds, 2132 bytes. > > Well, that's pretty bad. I see: > > Jul 7 04:05:49 wopr spamd[66708]: identified spam (8.4/5.0) for mph:501 in 4.0 seconds, 1206 bytes. > Jul 7 04:08:18 wopr spamd[66726]: clean message (-5.3/5.0) for mph:501 in 7.1 seconds, 2553 bytes. > > This is on a Cyrix 6x86 (166 MHz 486-class CPU) with no L2 cache. :-) > > Is the machine heavily loaded with other work? Assuming that there are > no messages between the ones you posted, it doesn't look like the machine > is overburdened by mail alone. we're back in business... Jul 8 09:50:11 athomson spamd[52899]: clean message (0.4/5.0) for ajt:1001 in 10.2 seconds, 3044 bytes. Jul 8 09:50:28 athomson spamd[52912]: clean message (0.4/5.0) for ajt:1001 in 10.3 seconds, 5840 bytes. Jul 8 09:54:35 athomson spamd[52952]: clean message (0.4/5.0) for ajt:1001 in 0.3 seconds, 3027 bytes. Jul 8 09:54:43 athomson spamd[52965]: clean message (1.3/5.0) for ajt:1001 in 0.4 seconds, 8524 bytes. put use_razor1 0 use_razor2 0 in my local config and now it goes real fast!! thanks for the tips.. so what is this razor business anyway?? ajt.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1057622233.52026.38.camel>