Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 09:05:11 +1000 From: Peter Jeremy <peter.jeremy@alcatel.com.au> To: ticso@cicely.de Cc: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem building Mozilla Message-ID: <20030721230511.GN430@gsmx07.alcatel.com.au> In-Reply-To: <20030721105042.GD19386@cicely12.cicely.de> References: <20030716215658.GA43409@gsmx07.alcatel.com.au> <20030717132611.GJ14530@cicely12.cicely.de> <20030718031240.GF430@gsmx07.alcatel.com.au> <20030718094556.GE19386@cicely12.cicely.de> <20030721032508.GH430@gsmx07.alcatel.com.au> <20030721105042.GD19386@cicely12.cicely.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2003-Jul-21 12:50:43 +0200, Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely12.cicely.de> wrote: >On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 01:25:08PM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote: >> On 2003-Jul-18 11:45:56 +0200, Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely12.cicely.de> wrote: >> >I compiled myself with: >> >CFLAGS=-O2 -pipe >> >CPUTYPE?=ev56 >> >> I'll try that and see what happens. Did you specify 'WITH_OPTIMIZED_CFLAGS' >> or any other tunables? CFLAGS=-O2 -pipe -g CPUTYPE?=ev56 helped - it now spits out reams of unaligned accesses and a large number of "junk pointer in free() - too high" messages and finally dies with a segmentation violation in FcCharSetDestroy() trying to load a long from an address 4 bytes below the end of a segment. It looks like the situation with gcc has changed so that -O2 is generating more correct code than -O (at least for mozilla). >The only special flag beside compiler flags is the following: >WITHOUT_XFT=yes I'll try that. >Well looks like the current port needs maintenance anyway, so I will >have to try it myself. Thanks for that. 1.3.1 seems fairly fragile and I can't get 1.4 to compile at all. Peter
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030721230511.GN430>