Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 13:11:50 +0200 From: Jens Rehsack <rehsack@liwing.de> To: "Pedro F. Giffuni" <giffunip@yahoo.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] enable choose of ghostscript interpreter Message-ID: <3F2504F6.8080707@liwing.de> In-Reply-To: <20030728044520.4583.qmail@web13402.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20030728044520.4583.qmail@web13402.mail.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 28.07.2003 06:45, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote: > Hi; > > Excuse me if I'm naive, but instead of patching all the ports that use > ghostscript, it would be better to have something like > > USE_GHOSTSCRIPT= yes > > It would just check if either ghostscript port is installed. > > cheers, > > Pedro. This argument has been raised by Tilman a few hours ago, too. See my answer there why I think it's better going slowly than to flounder. Best, Jens
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3F2504F6.8080707>