Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2003 16:03:09 -0400 From: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> To: stan <stanb@panix.com> Cc: Free BSD Questions list <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Which snmp port? Message-ID: <1060200189.723.44.camel@gyros> In-Reply-To: <20030806194732.GA28939@teddy.fas.com> References: <20030806194732.GA28939@teddy.fas.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-u9JX7/7Tq1xyEZFRh+ee Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2003-08-06 at 15:47, stan wrote: > There seem to be 2 (or 3) ports of UCD snmp in the ports tree, and the > description files don't enlighten me as to the differences. >=20 > Could someone clue me in as to the reasons to use on vs the other? I would use net/net-snmp (net-snmp 5.x) if you plan on using it for real device/system management. It has many new features and improvements over 4.x. I maintain and use net-snmp4 solely for a Perl application I wrote that currently has some problems with the 5.x modules. Joe --=20 PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc --=-u9JX7/7Tq1xyEZFRh+ee Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA/MV79b2iPiv4Uz4cRAuYLAJ46Oi4al9of5FEa45AyfgztMI6exgCeMHsF ngc4CAsMfAhodphIlw/Ucoc= =FDF/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-u9JX7/7Tq1xyEZFRh+ee--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1060200189.723.44.camel>