Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 14:38:58 +0930 From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey <grog@FreeBSD.org> To: James Long <james_mapson@umpquanet.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ThinkPad T21: sio0 detected as 8250 UART Message-ID: <20030807050858.GX24770@wantadilla.lemis.com> In-Reply-To: <20030807044401.GA80638@ns.museum.rain.com> References: <20030807044401.GA80638@ns.museum.rain.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--yBbBYFH0ZHvzMoI/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday, 6 August 2003 at 21:44:01 -0700, James Long wrote: > Is this correct? I can't find any specs on the IBM website which > specify what UART the serial port uses/emulates, but FreeBSD thinks > its an 8250: > > sio0: configured irq 4 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 This suggests that it can't find it. The port is going to be part of the support chip set. It's been decades since the serial port was a chip by itself. > sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0 > sio0: type 8250 Strange that it should then report one anyway. Is the port enabled in the BIOS? FWIW, I had a T22 a while back, and I used the serial port extensively, so there's probably no serious problem. Greg -- When replying to this message, please copy the original recipients. If you don't, I may ignore the reply or reply to the original recipients. For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/questions.html See complete headers for address and phone numbers --yBbBYFH0ZHvzMoI/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/Md7qIubykFB6QiMRAhzTAKCZUknNTiRIr3e9ipEcwyy4AHiBWgCghAd2 Rn+LWasm2zHVnnBdKa1VwYo= =6ooF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --yBbBYFH0ZHvzMoI/--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030807050858.GX24770>