Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 14:54:37 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> To: Arjan van Leeuwen <avleeuwen@piwebs.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What is the actual status of Audigy2 support in 5.1-CURRENT? Message-ID: <20030818215437.GB67059@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <200308182147.00499.avleeuwen@piwebs.com> References: <3F40EBD7.8080909@twcny.rr.com> <20030818163718.GA64561@dragon.nuxi.com> <200308182147.00499.avleeuwen@piwebs.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 09:47:00PM +0200, Arjan van Leeuwen wrote: > On Monday 18 August 2003 18:37, David O'Brien wrote: > <snip> > > I use this uncommitted patch (I haven't been able to test it against > > older SB Live! 128 cards): > <snip> > > On http://chibis.persons.gfk.ru/audigy/, Yuriy Tsibizov claims that his > patches work with both the SB Live! and the Audigy. > > If there are so many working patches around, isn't it time that one of them > gets in the tree? What is the problem here? I haven't check his in a while, but many of the patches running around are a complete rewrite of the emu10k driver. Not being a sound device driver guy, I personally am not willing to commit a complete rewrite. I am willing to champion and commit patches that keep to the existing driver and only adds Audgy2 support. Unfortunately those in-the-know that are writing Audgy2 support aren't keeping to this restriction. If my posted patches were known to work on SB Live! 128, I'd commit them as I can follow them enough to understand the changes. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030818215437.GB67059>