Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 16:06:42 +0200 From: Jean-Baptiste Quenot <jb.quenot@caraldi.com> To: java@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ant script annoyances Message-ID: <20030911140640.GA22265@watt.intra.caraldi.com> In-Reply-To: <20030911151218.J23585@puget.esil.univ-mrs.fr> References: <20030909215210.GA5404@grimoire.chen.org.nz> <20030910204830.GA60171@grimoire.chen.org.nz> <200309111110.42838.ernst.dehaan@nl.wanadoo.com> <20030911151218.J23585@puget.esil.univ-mrs.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Herve Quiroz: > Although I was quite fond of the current behaviour when you > implemented it, I just faced the problem last night and I found it > very annoying. Just a quick note to say that yes, the behaviour of automatically adding jars to the classpath is great, but not in the scope of Ant. It could just be a shell script that one could use independently by sourcing /usr/local/share/java/setup-classpath.sh (let's call it like that) before invoking ant. I use my own algorithm for setting up the classpath, but this has definitely *nothing* to do with ant. Every project should have a copy of the libs IMHO. Ant should not rely on FreeBSD's installed classes for proper function. It is not portable that way. The magical script fragment should only be considered *convenience* shell function, but should not be included in /usr/local/bin/ant. Best regards, -- Jean-Baptiste Quenot http://caraldi.com/jbq/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030911140640.GA22265>