Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 20:34:28 +0200 From: Jean-Baptiste Quenot <jb.quenot@caraldi.com> To: java@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ant script annoyances Message-ID: <20030911183428.GA1559@watt.intra.caraldi.com> In-Reply-To: <20030911172451.H57407@puget.esil.univ-mrs.fr> References: <20030909215210.GA5404@grimoire.chen.org.nz> <20030911141020.GB22265@watt.intra.caraldi.com> <200309111621.31123.ernst.dehaan@nl.wanadoo.com> <20030911172451.H57407@puget.esil.univ-mrs.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Herve Quiroz: > --all -> CLASSPATH contains all JARs and subdirs from $JAVASHAREDIR. This is the current behaviour. > --add -> Add selected paths and JARs in the current CLASSPATH variable > instead of overriding it. This is easily achieved by setting CLASSPATH="$CLASSPATH:additionalLib.jar" anywhere you want that to happen. I think we should keep things simple. BTW would it be possible to include the classpath computing script in either the jdk port or the javavmwrapper port, to avoid creating a port just for that? Because a port is maybe too much for just that script. The script probably won't have version numbers, tarballs, and so on... -- Jean-Baptiste Quenot http://caraldi.com/jbq/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030911183428.GA1559>