Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 09:42:27 +0200 (CEST) From: Harti Brandt <brandt@fokus.fraunhofer.de> To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: upgrade from static to dynamic root Message-ID: <20030915093928.T84652@beagle.fokus.fraunhofer.de> In-Reply-To: <20030914115451.GA9184@sunbay.com> References: <20030911142821.S69286@beagle.fokus.fraunhofer.de> <20030914115451.GA9184@sunbay.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 14 Sep 2003, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
RE>On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 02:44:55PM +0200, Harti Brandt wrote:
RE>>
RE>> Hi,
RE>>
RE>> I just tried to upgrade one of my systems from a static root from july to
RE>> an actual dynamic root. The installworld went fine 'til the place where
RE>> /bin/test is installed. At that point the installation stopped with "ELF
RE>> interpreter /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 not found". And really /libexec is not
RE>> populated yet. May it be, that the makefile uses one of the newly
RE>> installed tools during install? For example 'ln' to make the link test ->
RE>> [?
RE>>
RE>It shouldn't happen, because we save test and [ in ${INSTALLTMP}.
RE>It looks like something hardcodes /bin/test. I've grepped the
RE>src/ makefiles and cannot find such a place. Where exactly did
RE>it happen in the installworld for you?
It installed /bin/test and then failed just when it was going to make the
link to '['. Unfortunately this is rather hard to reproduce, unless I roll
everything back.
harti
RE>> Also, wouldn't it be helpful to populate /rescue before /bin? Just in
RE>> the case something goes wrong between installing been and rescue for the
RE>> first time?
RE>>
RE>Good idea!
RE>
RE>
RE>Cheers,
RE>
--
harti brandt,
http://www.fokus.fraunhofer.de/research/cc/cats/employees/hartmut.brandt/private
brandt@fokus.fraunhofer.de, harti@freebsd.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030915093928.T84652>