Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 11:09:19 -0400 (EDT) From: "Timothy J. Luoma" <luomat@peak.org> To: "Marc Ramirez" <marc.ramirez@bluecirclesoft.com> Cc: chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What are people using for MUA's nowadays? Message-ID: <1203.68.23.220.63.1064848159.squirrel@webmail.peak.org> In-Reply-To: <20030929150044.GC67893@www.bluecirclesoft.com> References: <20030922104213.L335@www.bluecirclesoft.com> <20030929150044.GC67893@www.bluecirclesoft.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Marc Ramirez said: > On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 10:50:07AM -0400, Marc Ramirez wrote: >> >> At 29 1/2, I feel like an old fart, because I'm still using >> pine. I know, >> it's horrible of me. But it's the first thing I used when I >> got to >> college and got my first UNIX account. And I've never really >> had a reason >> to change. > > Just to follow up on the whole MUA discussion, since I know > everyone > has been waiting with bated breath... I tried several > suggestions, and > finally settled on mutt and SpamAssassin. I'm not much of a > GUI > person, anyway, and any chance to use regexes while handling > mail... > > Thanks, everyone, for your advice! So in ten years you've updated from PINE to MUTT ;-? Heh. Well, you're still ahead of me. On my shell accounts I still use PINE. Tried MUTT once. Decided it was more than I needed (well, PINE + procmail was all I needed). Enjoy TjL
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1203.68.23.220.63.1064848159.squirrel>