Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2003 15:14:12 -0500 (CDT) From: Chris Dillon <cdillon@wolves.k12.mo.us> To: twig les <twigles@yahoo.com> Cc: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Rumour Mill on FreeBSD Death Still .... Message-ID: <20031007150653.U31740@duey.wolves.k12.mo.us> In-Reply-To: <20031007200416.77115.qmail@web10102.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20031007200416.77115.qmail@web10102.mail.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 7 Oct 2003, twig les wrote: > > I wouldn't say that Windows Server/Workstation are "rigidly > > separated" in the least bit. > > Good point, I should have clarified that I was talking more about > the naming/advertising/sales strategies than the technical merits. > The simple way MS labeled one cd a workstation and one a server. Indeed. If nothing else, that just goes to show how such a classification works in the mind of the average person. The technical differences (if any) don't make a lick of a difference, it is all about the brainwa... err, marketing. Hmm... I think I'll take the "server" bit out of my sig, too. :-) -- Chris Dillon - cdillon(at)wolves.k12.mo.us FreeBSD: The fastest and most stable server OS on the planet - Available for IA32, IA64, PC98, Alpha, and UltraSPARC architectures - x86-64, PowerPC, ARM, MIPS, and S/390 under development - http://www.freebsd.org Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. A: Why is putting a reply at the top of the message frowned upon?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031007150653.U31740>