Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 00:46:18 -0300 (ADT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: Kenny Freeman <kennyf@pchg.net> Subject: Re: Jail FS questions. Message-ID: <20031010004358.L28590@ganymede.hub.org> In-Reply-To: <20031010031910.GA11148@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <20030803200948.GA10712@lewiz.org> <200310091700.09658.kennyf@pchg.net> <20031009223612.J28590@ganymede.hub.org> <20031010031910.GA11148@rot13.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote: > Yes, it's a good thing that some developers are finally working on > fixing some of the problems, but the fact remains that nullfs/unionfs > *are not known to work in all situations* (indeed, I was able to trigger > unionfs bugs within a few minutes of testing last time I tried on 5.x, > over the summer). Did you submit PRs for the crashes, or, because of the 'big scary warning', did you just shrug it off as 'it doesn't work'? > On the other hand, if there are developers working on unionfs who have > run out of known bugs to fix (I'd be sceptical about this since I don't > remember any unionfs-related commits over the past 6 months or so, > although there might be some work-in-progress patches floating around), > and you're willing to sacrifice your machines in the name of testing, > then you should talk to those developers. Last unionfs related commit was on June 18th of this year, actually ...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031010004358.L28590>