Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 19 Oct 2003 23:08:49 +0200
From:      Marc Espie <espie@nerim.net>
To:        Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Unification of distfiles
Message-ID:  <20031019210849.GA28936@tetto.gentiane.org>
In-Reply-To: <20031019203034.GA49257@rot13.obsecurity.org>
References:  <20031019155324.GA28256@tetto.gentiane.org> <20031019203034.GA49257@rot13.obsecurity.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 01:30:34PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> In FreeBSD land we have a main package build cluster that continually
> builds packages for all supported architectures and versions.  As a
> side-effect of the package builds we collect, verify and periodically
> update the distfiles on the master FreeBSD FTP site, and they are
> mirrored from there by the hierarchy of FTP mirror sites in the usual
> way.  From the point of view of the mirror operator this all happens
> automatically and they don't have to do anything special to deal with
> distfiles.

Assume the author of ImageMagick updates his tarball, but doesn't change
the name, so that there are two ImageMagick-5.2.9.tar.gz with distinct 
sha1 checksums.

On OpenBSD mirrors, the old one stays available, under
sha1/<checksum>/ImageMagick-5.2.9.tar.gz

If I understand you correctly, your build/update cycle will overwrite
the old one. And users will have to update their ports tree to be able
to use the new tarball without a checksum error, since the old one is no
longer available.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031019210849.GA28936>