Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 05:56:08 +1100 From: Peter Jeremy <PeterJeremy@optushome.com.au> To: Adam Weinberger <adamw@freebsd.org> Cc: Mick Walker <materialised@privacy.net> Subject: Re: Open Office 1.1 Message-ID: <20031116185608.GD39616@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> In-Reply-To: <20031115222623.GU40706@toxic.magnesium.net> References: <1068476146.702.3.camel@purehacker.com> <20031115222120.GA87178@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <20031115222623.GU40706@toxic.magnesium.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 05:26:23PM -0500, Adam Weinberger wrote: >>> (11.15.2003 @ 1721 PST): Peter Jeremy said, in 1.6K: << >> What's worse, it's not possible to build OOo-1.1 with the current >> jdk14 port. The OOo-1.1 Makefile has jdk1.4.1 as the default JDKDIR >> so the default build will die unless you have jdk1.4.1 installed. If >> you override JDKDIR to point to jdk1.4.2, the build will report that >> OOo is using a deprecated Java interface and die. (Unfortunately, I've >> deleted that build log). >>> end of "Re: Open Office 1.1" from Peter Jeremy << > >There was a commit this morning that was supposed to fix that. Have you >re-cvsupped and tried again since this morning? JDKDIR in the Makefile still appears wrong but I fixed that manually and it built OK (though it still has the "can't find GTK" warning at the end). I haven't tested it yet. Peter
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031116185608.GD39616>