Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 24 Nov 2003 11:07:59 -0500
From:      Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>
To:        Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>, Artur Pydo <artur@pydo.org>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ppp(8) v. 3.1 : PPPoE lqr problem.
Message-ID:  <6.0.1.1.0.20031124110621.0698a788@209.112.4.2>
In-Reply-To: <200311241659.49594.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
References:  <3D98E439.1010400@pydo.org> <200311241617.15051.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> <6.0.1.1.0.20031124103034.0702e0f8@209.112.4.2> <200311241659.49594.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 10:59 AM 24/11/2003, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
>On Monday 24 November 2003 16:46, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> > Are you sure you actually connect to an ERX on the other end, and its
> > actually negotiating LQR ?  e.g. if you add LQM to the logging section, do
> > you see
> > tun0: LQM: deflink: Will send LQR every 10.00 secs
> > or do you see
> > tun0: LQM: deflink: LQR/ECHO LQR not negotiated
>
>Yes.
>
>LQM: deflink: Will send LQR every 30.00 secs
>
>I even found this way back in my ppp.log:
>Phase: deflink: ** Too many LQR packets lost **
>
>So it's actually doing what it should. :)

But is it doing that because its never hearing the LQR reply ?   And for 
sure its an ERX on the other end ?

         ---Mike 



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6.0.1.1.0.20031124110621.0698a788>