Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      09 Dec 2003 18:16:18 -0800
From:      Mooneer Salem <mooneer@translator.cx>
To:        Marko Zec <zec@tel.fer.hr>
Cc:        Mike K <mike@m2wh.com>
Subject:   Re: Multiple Ips in Jail
Message-ID:  <1071022578.16870.3.camel@dell-ucsd.lifeafterking.org>
In-Reply-To: <200312100014.39358.zec@tel.fer.hr>
References:  <20031209073926.C6D5E43D09@mx1.FreeBSD.org> <1070998966.5649.6.camel@dell-ucsd.lifeafterking.org> <200312100014.39358.zec@tel.fer.hr>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello,

Multiple IP functionality is part of the jail separation patch I made
earlier this year for 5.0 while playing with using jails as a VPS
solution. It includes other stuff besides multiple IP addresses; I
basically used the mijail 4.x patch as a reference, changing code to
refer to struct thread instead of struct proc as needed. I have
everything up at
http://msalem.translator.cx/dist/jail_seperation.v7.patch, if you want
to look at it.

Thanks,

On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 15:14, Marko Zec wrote:
> On Tuesday 09 December 2003 20:42, Mooneer Salem wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Mon, 2003-12-08 at 23:39, Mike K wrote:
> > > Anyone successfully get this to work in a working environment, not
> > > just install?
> >
> > I'm thinking that this would be a better solution for a virtual
> > hosting environment (once stabilized):
> > http://www.tel.fer.hr/zec/BSD/vimage/. In any case, I've gotten it
> > working under VMWare using 5.0-RELEASE and am able to access the
>                              ^^^^^^^^^^^
> 
> Was this a typo or have you really succeeded in porting the patch to the 
> 5.x branch? The original diffs are against 4.9-R, and when applied 
> against -CURRENT they yield almost a complete reject.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Marko
> 



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1071022578.16870.3.camel>