Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 12:26:17 -0500 From: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org> To: "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@FreeBSD.org> Cc: www@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: link Message-ID: <20031230122617.1d00ec3e.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20031230171536.GB674@arthur.nitro.dk> References: <20031230164013.75450.qmail@web41504.mail.yahoo.com> <20031230115725.1f09e24e.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> <20031230171536.GB674@arthur.nitro.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 18:15:38 +0100 "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 2003.12.30 11:57:25 -0500, Tom Rhodes wrote: > > On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 08:40:13 -0800 (PST) > > Mobasher Sobhan <moba2k@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > The port specified does not exist, or has an invalid > > > name: > > > > > > > > > ports/apache13-fp/pkg-descr > > > You are coming from > > > > > > http://www%2efreebsd%2eorg/doc/en%5fUS%2eISO8859%2d1/books/faq/applications%2ehtml. > > > > Perhaps in these cases we should have people email the > > Maintainer or have the email go to ports@? > > Well, in this case the problem was that the port category was missing in > the FAQ, so www-(/doc-) was the correct responsible... > > I'm not really sure in which situations ports@ might be more appropriate > to send mail to (but there probably are some). True in this case, but at times (for instance when a port cannot be located anymore in the search) it may be easier to let people know that either an update has not been done on the site or to email ports. Perhaps I'm just thinking too much, not sure. -- Tom Rhodes
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031230122617.1d00ec3e.trhodes>