Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 22:28:12 +0100 From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: alpha@freebsd.org Subject: Re: structure padding Message-ID: <xzpoete2kr7.fsf@dwp.des.no> In-Reply-To: <200401081542.49500.jhb@FreeBSD.org> (John Baldwin's message of "Thu, 8 Jan 2004 15:42:49 -0500") References: <xzpoete42r1.fsf@dwp.des.no> <200401081542.49500.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> writes: > Maybe: > > struct eproc { > union { > pid_t e_sid; > long e_oldspare; > } > long e_spare[1]; > > (I think gcc supports anonymous unions like that.) I thought about that, but it's butt-ugly... Does anyone have an Alpha running 4.x that I could test this on? > In 6.0 you could remove the union hack and change the ABI, assuming that = you=20 > want to put this in 5.x as well. 5.x has a completely different struct kinfo_proc which already contains the session id. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpoete2kr7.fsf>