Date: 09 Jan 2004 09:33:30 +0100 From: sebastian ssmoller <sebastian.ssmoller@web.de> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: snd_fm801 Message-ID: <1073637209.900.22.camel@tyrael.linnet> In-Reply-To: <20040109020415.GQ38657@cnd.mcgill.ca> References: <1073325974.914.5.camel@tyrael.linnet> <20040108172614.GG38657@cnd.mcgill.ca> <1073588439.900.15.camel@tyrael.linnet> <20040109020415.GQ38657@cnd.mcgill.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
now it works for me :) $ dmesg <snip> fm801_pci_probe device id found pcm0: <Forte Media FM801 Audio Controller> port 0xb800-0xb87f irq 5 at device 13.0 on pci0 pcm0: <Wolfson WM9704Q AC97 Codec> </snip> $ cat /dev/sndstat FreeBSD Audio Driver (newpcm) Installed devices: pcm0: <Forte Media FM801 Audio Controller> at io 0xb800 irq 5 (1p/1r/0v channels duplex default) thx seb On Fri, 2004-01-09 at 03:04, Mathew Kanner wrote: > On Jan 08, sebastian ssmoller wrote: > > hi, > > i applied that patch. here is the dmesg output: > > > > <snip> > > fm801_pci_probe device id found > > fm801_pci_probe not expect controller > > </snip> > > Well then, from the source code > > /* > * XXX: quick check that device actually has sound capabilities. > * The problem is that some cards built around FM801 chip only > * have radio tuner onboard, but no sound capabilities. There > * is no "official" way to quickly check this, because all > * IDs are exactly the same. The only difference is 0x28 > * device control register, described in FM801 specification > * as "SRC/Mixer Test Control/DFC Status", but without > * any more detailed explanation. According to specs, and > * available sample cards (SF256-PCP-R and SF256-PCS-R) its > * power-on value should be `0', while on AC97-less tuner > * card (SF64-PCR) it was 0x80. > */ > > Could you force the test to be true (right after this comment) > and try it again? > > Thanks, > --Mat
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1073637209.900.22.camel>