Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 20 Jan 2004 19:45:14 -0800
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To:        Rostislav Krasny <rosti_bsd@yahoo.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: GCC 3.4.0 and FreeBSD base distibution
Message-ID:  <20040121034514.GC29338@xor.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <20040121032056.72352.qmail@web14810.mail.yahoo.com>
References:  <20040121032056.72352.qmail@web14810.mail.yahoo.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--da4uJneut+ArUgXk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 07:20:56PM -0800, Rostislav Krasny wrote:
> Hello everebody.
>=20
> As you can see at http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.4/index.html the GNU project
> is preparing to release their next major release version of GCC. There
> is a list of changes this release will implement. You can read it at
> http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.4/changes.html  My question is about the first
> change that is declared in that list:
>=20
> GNU Make is now required to build GCC
>=20
> Does it mean that GNU Make will be a part of FreeBSD base distribution
> or GCC will be patched so it can be build by the standard (IEEE Std
> 1003.1) make? As far as I know FreeBSD's make conforms to this
> standard, almost.

No, FreeBSD does not use the GCC build infrastructure to build the gcc
suite as part of 'make world', so gmake will continue to not be used
or required.

Kris

--da4uJneut+ArUgXk
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFADfXKWry0BWjoQKURAnbtAKCzta9H8G1RGFLj2XgTUWnHwcZ3+gCfZQwN
ntc9fY9TmOnpN7jgYSuHXgg=
=X4tK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--da4uJneut+ArUgXk--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040121034514.GC29338>