Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 14:32:34 -0500 From: Ken Smith <kensmith@cse.Buffalo.EDU> To: Doug White <dwhite@gumbysoft.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Updating from 4.9-RELEASE Message-ID: <20040125193234.GA24573@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> In-Reply-To: <20040125110630.F81485@carver.gumbysoft.com> References: <BAY13-F22q5xVz5WkmR00000eff@hotmail.com> <1074659659.28370.10.camel@athena> <20040121141952.GA17839@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> <20040125110630.F81485@carver.gumbysoft.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 11:12:21AM -0800, Doug White wrote:
> Its in UPDATING on -CURRENT. I guess we need to explicitly warn people to
> read the -CURRENT UPDATING and not the -STABLE one when planning their
> upgrade.
For what it's worth I was reading the right file. If you want to warn
people about something warn them not to be afraid of doing something
before they actually try it. :-( Booting a 5.X kernel in a 4.X world
sounded scary but seems to have worked just fine.
> Also see the section "To upgrade in-place from 4.x-stable to current" near
> the bottom of the file.
Missed that part completely. :-( Thanks.
--
Ken Smith
- From there to here, from here to | kensmith@cse.buffalo.edu
there, funny things are everywhere. |
- Theodore Geisel |
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040125193234.GA24573>