Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 22:53:18 +0100 From: Harald Schmalzbauer <h@schmalzbauer.de> To: danny@ricin.com Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to calculate bsdlabel size Message-ID: <200402042253.23181@harrymail> In-Reply-To: <200402042156.06623.danny@ricin.com> References: <200402042131.40335@harrymail> <200402042156.06623.danny@ricin.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Boundary-02=_TnWIAi8SRh+IXGF Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: signed data Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday 04 February 2004 21:56, Danny Pansters wrote: > On Wednesday 04 February 2004 21:31, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I manually created disklabels with a size number of 10485760. > > I wanted to have 5 GigaByte big labels, so 5*1024*1024*1024/512=3D10485= 760. > > Now after doing a newfs and mounting the new label, df -h reports a size > > of 4.8GB. > > Can someone please enlighten me? > > > > Thanks, > > > > -Harry > > Per default, 5% of the space is reserved for root, so that in the worse > case you can always write at least *something* to it as root. When running > out of disk space you can actually get a 'df' of 106% or so because of > this. It's a FAQ. But it's not my problem. What you mean results in limited available space, = but=20 doesn't have any influence on Size summary. Btw I did a newfs with -m 0 so = it=20 can't be the reaseon. =2DHarry > > HTH > > Dan --Boundary-02=_TnWIAi8SRh+IXGF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBAIWnTBylq0S4AzzwRAmBbAJ4oF9dK6dzJqpWj85U27oicd4mnQwCdGhO/ vQ9u7JgSUdds3w7SGdvIK8Y= =CyMI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_TnWIAi8SRh+IXGF--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200402042253.23181>