Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2004 17:17:06 -0800 From: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org>, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav <des@des.no> Cc: amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [current tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64 Message-ID: <200402081717.06587.peter@wemm.org> In-Reply-To: <20040207111719.GB46350@FreeBSD.org.ua> References: <20040206222812.818607303A@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> <xzp8yjf4061.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20040207111719.GB46350@FreeBSD.org.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Saturday 07 February 2004 03:17 am, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Sat, Feb 07, 2004 at 12:08:22PM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: > > Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> writes: > > > On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 05:28:12PM -0500, Tinderbox wrote: > > >> ===> accf_http > > > > > > AFAIK modules are not yet supported on amd64..the tinderbox > > > shouldn't try building them. > > > > They usually build fine. If the tinderbox isn't supposed to build > > them, GENERIC and NOTES should have 'makeoptions > > MODULES_OVERRIDE=""' > > NO_MODULES is better. Yes, I forgot to add it when the lint stuff went in. It was in GENERIC the whole time. -- Peter Wemm - peter@wemm.org; peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200402081717.06587.peter>