Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 11:22:03 +0200 (EET) From: Andriy Tkachuk <ant@imt.com.ua> To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPFIREWALL_DEFAULT_TO_ACCEPT becomes default to deny Message-ID: <20040209111434.G33433@tele.imt.com.ua> In-Reply-To: <20040209105800.T33433@tele.imt.com.ua> References: <0FDD52D38220D611B7CC0004763B3744F80826@HNTS-04> <20040209105800.T33433@tele.imt.com.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
sorry: i just checked handbook and there is written that there is two ways: new and traditional. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/kernelconfig-building.html So: you failed in traditional, anyway it's interesting if there will be the same result with the new way. On Mon, 9 Feb 2004, Andriy Tkachuk wrote: > just for experiment, try: > > cd /usr/src > make buildkernel KERNCONF=<YOUR_KERN_CONF> && make installkernel KERNCONF=<YOUR_KERN_CONF> > > > config & make weren't complaining so, installed the kernel, reboot and there > > it was: > ... > > I triple checked the config file for the right settings. And, as I did > > config && make depend && make install the system > > wasn't complaing about a thing. > > did you ever make clean? anyway this is true: you are using the old style > of kernel rebuilding. On my mind the new one is more convenient, so I don't > know why people fight with old one - habit? :) > > just do as is written in handbook and then say what is not true in it > > regards
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040209111434.G33433>