Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 07:57:09 +0100 From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: "Matthew D. Fuller" <fullermd@over-yonder.net> Cc: Dung Patrick <dkt@digitalme.com> Subject: Re: [call for helpers!] Tuning for the Beaver Challenge Message-ID: <xzp1xp3toai.fsf@dwp.des.no> In-Reply-To: <20040209232015.GE89781@over-yonder.net> (Matthew D. Fuller's message of "Mon, 9 Feb 2004 17:20:15 -0600") References: <1076348333.b793fda0dkt@digitalme.com> <xzpznbsxg5f.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20040209232015.GE89781@over-yonder.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Matthew D. Fuller" <fullermd@over-yonder.net> writes: > > CPUTYPE ?=3D pentiumpro > I recall a thread somewhere recently about pentiumpro being decidedly > suboptimal for some new CPUs. Although, on 4.x with the older version > of gcc, it may not matter. I believe the reverse is true - pentiumpro proved to be superior to p3 and p4 even on p3s and p4s. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzp1xp3toai.fsf>