Date: 15 Mar 2004 15:43:05 -0700 From: llewelly@xmission.com To: Paul Seniura <pdseniura@techie.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GCC optimization bugs -- still there or a historic artifact? Message-ID: <s3rbrmxiveu.fsf@xmission.xmission.com> In-Reply-To: <20040315181625.7D59D5C29@techpc04.okladot.state.ok.us> References: <20040315001052.GA20921@diogenis.ceid.upatras.gr> <20040313192357.GA10778@diogenis.ceid.upatras.gr> <20040315181625.7D59D5C29@techpc04.okladot.state.ok.us>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Paul Seniura" <pdseniura@techie.com> writes: [snip] > And as for PPC, I've compiled things as high as -O5, > which is its limit I believe. ;) [snip] hm, no docs for -On, n > 3 at http://xrl.us/brh2 . Looking at the code: http://xrl.us/brh5 (search for 'optimize >= 3'), I don't see any evidence that -O5 is different from -O3. Though apple gcc is somewhat changed from fsf gcc, so maybe apple gcc does something different.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?s3rbrmxiveu.fsf>