Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 26 Mar 2004 15:54:22 -0500
From:      Lanny Baron <lnb@FreeBSDsystems.COM>
To:        sclements@linkline.com
Cc:        freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Dual or quad NIC boards?
Message-ID:  <4064987E.8030904@FreeBSDsystems.COM>
In-Reply-To: <20040326201244.524A39CCF4@smtp1.linkline.com>
References:  <20040326201244.524A39CCF4@smtp1.linkline.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Now show me a ping from all of them :)

Samuel Clements wrote:

>I have one of the Intel Quad Gig nics running in 4.6-RELEASE.
>
>em0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
>        options=3<rxcsum,txcsum>
>        inet 192.168.50.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.50.255
>        ether 00:04:23:08:15:f4
>        media: Ethernet 100baseTX <full-duplex>
>        status: active
>em1: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
>        options=3<rxcsum,txcsum>
>        inet 192.168.52.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.52.255
>        ether 00:04:23:08:15:f5
>        media: Ethernet 1000baseTX <full-duplex>
>        status: active
>em2: flags=8802<BROADCAST,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
>        options=3<rxcsum,txcsum>
>        ether 00:04:23:08:15:f6
>        media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseTX <full-duplex>)
>        status: active
>em3: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
>        options=3<rxcsum,txcsum>
>        inet 192.168.54.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.54.255
>        ether 00:04:23:08:15:f7
>        media: Ethernet 1000baseTX <full-duplex>
>        status: active
>
>  -Sam
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org
>[mailto:owner-freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Shawn Barnhart
>Sent: Friday, March 26, 2004 8:10 AM
>To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org
>Subject: Dual or quad NIC boards?
>
>I'm in the market for a dual or quad NIC board compatible with 4-STABLE
>(I'll do 5.x if I have to) for a router/firewall.
>
>Intel make a couple, are they known to be compatible?  The NOS software
>compatibilty for the four port model lists it as "FreeBSD (latest kernel)",
>whatever that means.
>
>The 4-port one is my preference, although I'm not totally thrilled with the
>prices I've seen for it -- nearly $500.  Anyone familiar with any cheaper
>versions?
>
>_______________________________________________
>freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org mailing list
>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hardware
>To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hardware-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>
>_______________________________________________
>freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org mailing list
>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hardware
>To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hardware-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>  
>

-- 
=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=
Lanny Baron
Proud to be 100% FreeBSD
http://www.FreeBSDsystems.COM
North American Toll Free: 1.877.963.1900
European Toll Free http://www.freebsdsystems.com/toll_fr.html
=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4064987E.8030904>