Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2004 10:49:20 -0700 From: Tim Kientzle <tim@kientzle.com> To: "Brian F. Feldman" <green@FreeBSD.org> Cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/tar Makefile bsdtar.1 bsdtar.c bsdtar.h bsdtar_platform.h matching.c read.c util.c write.c Message-ID: <40743F20.90900@kientzle.com> In-Reply-To: <200404071742.i37HgaLi081038@green.homeunix.org> References: <200404071742.i37HgaLi081038@green.homeunix.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Brian F. Feldman wrote: > Tim Kientzle <tim@kientzle.com> wrote: > > Oh, I was only implementing it inside the libarchive default routines > because it was easy. I also think that if this is done to speed up tar, it > should be done in tar and not libarchive. What are you using to benchmark? > I'm interested in seeing what happens with a worker thread/with a larger > decompression buffer/etc. I think I was just using: bsdtar -cvjf /dev/null /usr for compression benchmarking. For decompression benchmarking, something like bsdtar -tf archive.tbz >/dev/null should suffice.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?40743F20.90900>