Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 20:11:09 +0000 From: Max Laier <max@love2party.net> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: altq in main tree? Message-ID: <200404222011.17959.max@love2party.net> In-Reply-To: <20040422120440.GA29038@rocco.epita.fr> References: <20040421114802.GA4820@profi.kharkov.ua> <200404211456.34624.max@love2party.net> <20040422120440.GA29038@rocco.epita.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Boundary-02=_lbCiAApHgHsRi2D Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday 22 April 2004 12:04, jeremie le-hen wrote: > > > I just wonder if there are any chances that altq will be in the main > > > tree in the near future? > > > > I work on altq integration on and off for a couple of weeks, yet the > > outcome is unclear as the required locking for altq is not exactly easy > > to do. But as vital locking is a must-do item for any new subsystem the= se > > days, we will have to see how it works out. > > I must havemissed something. I though that ALTQ was already in the tree > since it is supposed to be fully integrated in pf. Yes it is fully integrated into pf, but as ALTQ is not present in FreeBSD=20 (yet) pf is build w/o this support. Just like it would be the case in OpenB= SD=20 when one builds a kernel w/o "options ALTQ". =2D-=20 Best regards, | mlaier@freebsd.org Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mlaier@EFnet --Boundary-02=_lbCiAApHgHsRi2D Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBAiCblXyyEoT62BG0RAgc0AJ9Bp7Uxz1D2QTpJD8WNNZXYduk0WgCdErzd 4dkuHAe0ikC5wZtN0kTqWYQ= =IkOY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_lbCiAApHgHsRi2D--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200404222011.17959.max>