Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 00:03:15 +0300 From: Nikos Ntarmos <ntarmos@ceid.upatras.gr> To: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Default support for GPT [was: Re: More than 8 labels per slice] Message-ID: <20040428210315.GA27365@diogenis.ceid.upatras.gr> In-Reply-To: <20040428204931.GA72739@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <200404270906.54407.current@schmalzbauer.de> <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1040427203300.51265B-100000@fledge.watson.org> <20040428012657.GA7257@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> <408F11C5.5030403@freebsd.org> <20040428204931.GA72739@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 01:49:31PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 08:07:01PM -0600, Scott Long wrote: > > I remember there being rumors a year or two ago about > > Intel trying to sack legacy BIOS and MBR support on x86 entirely > > and force everyone to use EFI and GPT. > > AMD doesn't have this desire, so please don't assume this for the new > AMD64 platform. I wonder in what way will SRM fail with an EFI/GPT-only partition table... :) \n\n -- Nikos "Noth" Ntarmos | < ntarmos at ceid dot upatras dot gr > NetCINS Lab. @ C.E.I.D. | [ http://{noth,p2p}.ceid.upatras.gr/ ] U. of Patras - Greece | ( 38.2594N, 21.7428E ) ( 1024D / CF95160A )
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040428210315.GA27365>