Date: Sat, 15 May 2004 01:19:04 +0400 From: Roman Kurakin <rik@cronyx.ru> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> Subject: Re: Sio & Puc memory mapped Message-ID: <40A537C8.1010407@cronyx.ru> In-Reply-To: <20040515041301.O22881@gamplex.bde.org> References: <40A26162.9030607@cronyx.ru> <20040512.200542.09569104.imp@bsdimp.com> <20040513155109.GB6572@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> <40A4E2CB.2000007@cronyx.ru> <20040515041301.O22881@gamplex.bde.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bruce Evans пишет: >On Fri, 14 May 2004, Roman Kurakin wrote: > > >>May I ask you to make some tests for me? >> >>We have a set of tests, which we use for testings of our async >>adapters. I add support for one of ours cards via puc(4)&uart(4) >>drivers. These tests works fine with patches for sio(4) driver (was >>tested with 5.2 sio), but fails with puc(4)&uart(4). >> >>I don't have any other cards supported by uart(4), so I can't test >>it by my self. If you have a time and ability, I'll send these tests >>for you. >> >> >Why not just use sio? It has been tested for hundreds if not thousands >of programmer hours in various versions over the last 16 years. uart >fails even simple tests, and has low performance. > I second. Sio works just fine with mem-maped cards after small patch. rik > >Bruce >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?40A537C8.1010407>