Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 17 May 2004 18:20:43 -0700
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To:        Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net>
Cc:        gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject:   Re: [PATCH/RFC] *BSD kernel debugging
Message-ID:  <20040518012043.GA47770@xor.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <20040517221703.GB67833@ns1.xcllnt.net>
References:  <200405171132.i4HBW0h5012696@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> <20040517200417.GA67285@ns1.xcllnt.net> <200405172045.i4HKjd4k014106@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> <20040517221703.GB67833@ns1.xcllnt.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 03:17:03PM -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 10:45:39PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> >=20
> >    I cannot prevent you from committing this, but if it doesn't address
> >    the items mentioned above, it may not be used on FreeBSD.  Unless I'm
> >    being relieved of gdb duties of course :-)
> >=20
> > Let's see.  My kvm stuff would still serve a purpose for older
> > releases.
>=20
> [still about FreeBSD] Yes, to certain extend. There's already a port
> for gdb6 in the ports collection and I presume it also works on
> FreeBSD 4.x. Nonetheless, I like having gdb work without local hacks,
> so from that perspective it's definitely valuable.

Actually no version of gdb in the ports collection works on 4.x.  Some
don't even work on 5.x.

Kris

--BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFAqWTrWry0BWjoQKURAtDxAKDlU+7DwuYaDh43dq4GFdERiJRifgCg281q
ZgougBprTK6UTqMSAi13DqE=
=WMbH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040518012043.GA47770>