Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 17:34:44 -0700 From: JG <amd64list@jpgsworld.com> To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why is MySQL nearly twice as fast on Linux/AMD64 Vs. FreeBSD/AMD64? Message-ID: <5.2.0.9.2.20040518173231.0145b0c0@mail.ojoink.com> In-Reply-To: <20040519001603.GA16821@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> References: <5.2.0.9.2.20040518170229.014bd258@mail.ojoink.com> <5.2.0.9.2.20040518103357.04c6cbb8@mail.ojoink.com> <5.2.0.9.2.20040518103357.04c6cbb8@mail.ojoink.com> <5.2.0.9.2.20040518170229.014bd258@mail.ojoink.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>I'd recommend replacing those 1GB modules with 4 512MB modules. That >should yeild improved performance across the board by giving both CPUs >their own RAM. > >-- Brooks Brooks, There are only 6 ram slots available on this board, for us it makes more sense to use the 1GB modules rather than the 512's. Before it goes into production I'll be adding 2 more 1GB modules. But right now I am just trying to figure out what OS it'll be on. I'm a FreeBSD guy so I've got my fingers crossed for some better FreeBSD performance after I recompile.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5.2.0.9.2.20040518173231.0145b0c0>