Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 14:55:15 -0700 From: Ade Lovett <ade@FreeBSD.org> To: Daniel Roethlisberger <daniel@roe.ch> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: automake port Message-ID: <B35983D0-B0F1-11D8-B3B3-000A956B6386@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20040528214800.GC5972@dragon.roe.ch> References: <20040527235959.G71364@sherman.trismegistus.net> <C43C14DA-B0CF-11D8-B3B3-000A956B6386@FreeBSD.org> <20040528214800.GC5972@dragon.roe.ch>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On May 28, 2004, at 14:48, Daniel Roethlisberger wrote: > Yet all other automake/autoconf ports are marked deprecated already, > and > they tell users to use automake18 / autoconf259 instead: Correct. > How does that correlate with your statement that automake18/autoconf259 > should not be used/installed yet? Is it wise to mark those ports > deprecated already, even though their replacement is not ready yet? Or > did I miss something? You missed the complexity of ports/66037, which we're currently testing right now. We had hoped for the two steps (extract autotools from bsd.port.mk, clean up autotools stage 1) to be a little closer together, but various things conspired against us. -aDe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?B35983D0-B0F1-11D8-B3B3-000A956B6386>