Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 08:47:51 +0200 From: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com> To: Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Melvyn Sopacua <ports@webteckies.org> Subject: Re: PORT_REPLACES_BASE_BIND and some gnome ports Message-ID: <40C40F97.8070904@fillmore-labs.com> In-Reply-To: <20040606234038.F1850@ync.qbhto.arg> References: <200404171307.49957.ports@webteckies.org> <408117AD.4000101@fillmore-labs.com> <20040606234038.F1850@ync.qbhto.arg>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Doug Barton wrote: > On Sat, 17 Apr 2004, Oliver Eikemeier wrote: > >> Try PORT_REPLACES_BASE_BIND8_INCLUDES. We can't check this from the >> Makefile >> though, but better be safe than sorry - it caused problems in the past. > > The problem with the includes was always BIND 8 only, it never affected > BIND 9. Also, the fix went in 2.5 months ago. I would suggest that after > the next BIND 8 (and 8.4.x) upgrade (which should be soon) that you > change your test to look explicitly for > PORT_REPLACES_BASE_BIND8_INCLUDES and not raise FUD where it isn't > warranted. You did read the `We can't check this from the Makefile' part, didn't you? -Oliver
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?40C40F97.8070904>