Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 21:28:58 +0200 From: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org, Andrew J Caines <A.J.Caines@halplant.com> Subject: Re: XFree86-4 balls up Message-ID: <200406082129.02406.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <20040608181011.GA18836@hal9000.halplant.com> References: <1086686577.779.36.camel@leguin> <BCEBE3B9.67%kaiwai@vfemail.net> <20040608181011.GA18836@hal9000.halplant.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Boundary-02=_+NhxAZby1lei9RP Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday 08 June 2004 20:10, Andrew J Caines wrote: > Matthy, > > > Everything is now compiling nicely. How could a few simply > > switches make the difference between something compiling and something > > going tits up? By triggering compiler bugs. So yes, it is a bug, but it's in gcc - and=20 chances that gcc 2.95.4 will receive much further maintenance are very slim= =20 indeed. > Because "optimisation" means taking something which works and turning it > into something which doesn't. > > Try building stuff with a non-gcc compiler _and_ optimisation. It's not unheard of that this can work. :) =2D-=20 ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org --Boundary-02=_+NhxAZby1lei9RP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBAxhN+Xhc68WspdLARAkBiAJ4j6AVC1t05w7rgN3zktHBjw9c5LQCdGVLL LnNMn+7PGc+xKx1s7AYhmrE= =9mJ1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_+NhxAZby1lei9RP--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200406082129.02406.michaelnottebrock>