Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2004 17:05:42 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: Change to INDEX format Message-ID: <20040620000542.GA1434@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20040619221346.GD824@zaphod.nitro.dk> References: <20040619021700.GA27883@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040619221346.GD824@zaphod.nitro.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Q68bSM7Ycu6FN28Q Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 12:13:46AM +0200, Simon L. Nielsen wrote: > On 2004.06.18 19:17:00 -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > This patch extends the format of the INDEX file to separately list > > FETCH_DEPENDS, EXTRACT_DEPENDS and PATCH_DEPENDS instead of lumping > > them all together with BUILD_DEPENDS. I need a version of this in > > order to support recent changes to the package build cluster, which > > adds the dependencies separately before the corresponding build stage, > > to test for errors that would be seen on a clean system. >=20 > Do you have a sample new INDEX somewhere? I would like to test the > web scripts, just to be sure, but INDEX building fails when I try at > the moment (could be I have messed something up since I don't normally > build INDEX myself). Here's a sample INDEX-5: http://www.freebsd.org/~kris/INDEX-5 Kris --Q68bSM7Ycu6FN28Q Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFA1NTVWry0BWjoQKURAsdtAJ9GlYDpVGoZ4RsaP6+QhmNfXzXcjwCfVvxs yaiR8qWQ4/p8C34iM/s8Hns= =ivtF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Q68bSM7Ycu6FN28Q--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040620000542.GA1434>