Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 03:32:56 -0500 From: Jon Noack <noackjr@alumni.rice.edu> To: netch@lucky.net Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: LOR (vm object - swap_pager swhash) Message-ID: <40E3CC38.90904@alumni.rice.edu> In-Reply-To: <20040701080628.GB80579@lucky.net> References: <20040701061818.GA80579@lucky.net> <20040701063105.GA20785@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040701080628.GB80579@lucky.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 07/01/04 03:06, Valentin Nechayev wrote: > Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 23:31:05, kris wrote: >>>> lock order reversal >> >> *yawn* :-) > > As newer -current is said as too broken, it wasn't got. If > revolutions round is finished, please say date for moderately calm > period which can be used for cvsupping. I think you misunderstand. This lock order reversal is a frequently reported false positive. It is harmless. For more information (see LOR id #1): http://sources.zabbadoz.net/freebsd/lor.html Kris responded with a yawn because he's answered this question so many times.... Jon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?40E3CC38.90904>