Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 22:19:40 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> To: /root/of/all/evil <r@zeik.wns.amu.edu.pl> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Applications starting problem (from /usr/local/etc/rc.d/) after upgrade Message-ID: <20040721221549.H61155@wonkity.com> In-Reply-To: <20040722040122.GA47848@zeik.wns.amu.edu.pl> References: <C96CF509350DEC44895435C5BC929B8486E7A1@orsmsx405> <20040721171150.A60713@wonkity.com> <20040722040122.GA47848@zeik.wns.amu.edu.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 22 Jul 2004, /root/of/all/evil wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 05:12:27PM -0600, Warren Block wrote:
>> On Wed, 21 Jul 2004, /root/of/all/evil wrote:
>>
>>> The only daemon (called application somwhere in my mail) that starts
>>> normally during
>>> system boot is apache2. Rest of them does not boot normally, but if I add
>>> them (I mean
>>> 'them' == the full path to their starting scripts in /usr/local/etc/rc.d/)
>>> to the end of
>>> apache`s script, then they are starting..
>>
>> Are they all set to executable (chmod +x)?
>
> Yes, they all are executable - if I add them to the end of the only script
> that is starting normally (wich i s apache2 in this case) they execute normally and
> the deamons are starting. But leaving them in /usr/local/etc/rc.d/ just do nothing.
I'm not sure we are talking about the same thing. Is the "x"
executable bit set when you do an ls -l in /usr/local/etc/rc.d?
# ls -l /usr/local/etc/rc.d
-r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 635 Jun 15 05:58 apache.sh
^ ^ ^
Are these bits set for all of the scripts in the directory?
-Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040721221549.H61155>