Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 12:55:53 -0700 From: Darcy Buskermolen <darcy@wavefire.com> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: TCP SACK backport to -STABLE Message-ID: <200408251255.53472.darcy@wavefire.com> In-Reply-To: <200408251544.18759.zec@icir.org> References: <200408242314.01915.zec@icir.org> <412BBDFA.5080508@elischer.org> <200408251544.18759.zec@icir.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On August 25, 2004 06:44 am, Marko Zec wrote: > On Wednesday 25 August 2004 00:15, Julian Elischer wrote: > > You do know don't you, that if you continue to do these things, you will > > be punnished by > > getting a CVS commit bit..? > > Well, I didn't write the code myself, just ported it from -CURRENT. Anyhow, > glad to see that people still care about the 4.x branch. > > Re that commit bit, what kind of commiter would that be who only likes to > work on -STABLE? :) The kind that would be liked by those who like some of the features of -CURRENT, but policy won't allow them to put them into production... -- Darcy Buskermolen Wavefire Technologies Corp. ph: 250.717.0200 fx: 250.763.1759 http://www.wavefire.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200408251255.53472.darcy>