Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 17:34:46 -0400 From: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@FreeBSD.org> To: Clement Laforet <sheepkiller@cultdeadsheep.org> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: Ports tree will be frozen in one week Message-ID: <1093642486.906.25.camel@gyros> In-Reply-To: <20040827232520.44738f3f.sheepkiller@cultdeadsheep.org> References: <1093631810.722.12.camel@gyros> <20040827232520.44738f3f.sheepkiller@cultdeadsheep.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-BMXTVShqjYAgtTyWA1fS Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2004-08-27 at 17:25, Clement Laforet wrote: > On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 14:36:50 -0400 > Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@FreeBSD.org> wrote: >=20 > > The ports tree will be frozen for the 5.3-RELEASE builds in one week > > (Friday September 3, 2004 at 2300 UTC). This freeze is scheduled to > > last two weeks. During this time, only portmgr approved commits will > > be allowed. >=20 > apache 2.0.51 will surely be released during freeze, do you think I can > have an approval for an update, or should I backport some fixes? I would bank on backporting fixes unless re@ feels strongly that apache 2.0.51 be in the release. The reason I say that is that the testing period might not be long enough, and if there is a major problem, 5.3-RELEASE will forever have a bad apache2 bundled with it. Joe >=20 > clem --=20 Joe Marcus Clarke FreeBSD GNOME Team :: marcus@FreeBSD.org gnome@FreeBSD.org FreeNode / #freebsd-gnome http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome --=-BMXTVShqjYAgtTyWA1fS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBBL6j2b2iPiv4Uz4cRAh4aAJ9NDPmVT5IwDO0M27wcWy1Y2uWdOwCggrMq iPdu2ustrLhB0aCcE76R6ME= =bEeH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-BMXTVShqjYAgtTyWA1fS--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1093642486.906.25.camel>