Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 10:14:44 +0200 From: Wilko Bulte <wb@freebie.xs4all.nl> To: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> Cc: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.3-BETA3 and tga... Message-ID: <20040908081443.GA7972@freebie.xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <20040908075335.GA16197@dhcp47.pn.xcllnt.net> References: <1094587559.845.4.camel@klamath.ankon.de.eu.org> <Pine.LNX.4.33.0409072211070.24958-100000@servww6.ww.uni-erlangen.de> <20040907211357.GA96722@ns1.xcllnt.net> <1094592557.845.7.camel@klamath.ankon.de.eu.org> <20040908024119.GA7290@alpha.pn.xcllnt.net> <1094626584.59700.5.camel@klamath.ankon.de.eu.org> <20040908075335.GA16197@dhcp47.pn.xcllnt.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 12:53:35AM -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote.. > On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 08:56:24AM +0200, Andreas Kohn wrote: > > > > > > I did a quick experiment and it looks newbusification will solve the > > > problem. Of course this opens pandora's box. The whole frame buffer > > > code is unsuitable of being newbusified. By design, I might add. It'll > > > be a lot of work. I think a kluge is called for but I'm not entirely > > > sure it's something I want or should spend my time on. I need to give > > > it some thought... > > > > what about the easiest kludge of all: Remove tga from GENERIC? > > It's being considered. Sure is.. :) -- Wilko Bulte wilko@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040908081443.GA7972>