Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 13:48:56 +0200 From: Piotr Smyrak <piotr.smyrak@heron.pl> To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Gnome 2.8 Message-ID: <20040916134856.76bcea49@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20040916113525.GA987@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> References: <50884.195.193.201.43.1095328215.squirrel@195.193.201.43> <1095328530.31898.10.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> <20040916113525.GA987@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 13:35:25 +0200, Simon Barner <barner@in.tum.de> wrote: > Pav Lucistnik wrote: > > V ?t, 16. 09. 2004 v 11:50, dennis@rootxs.nl píše: > > > > > Can you give me an indication when Gnome 2.8 is going to be > > > ported to FreeBSD? Days, weeks, months? Keep up the good work! > > > > Ports of 2.8 are ready, but the ports tree is locked in > > preparation of FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE. GNOME 2.8 will be merged > > into ports tree once 5.3-RELEASE is announced, which is > > scheduled to happen on October 3rd. > > Do you exspect any major shared lib version bumps (pango, > gtk/glib,...)? If no, I will give it a shot on my desktop, and > otherwise I will wait(impatientely ;-) those other 2 weeks, until > it's merged into the ports tree. It's libgnomecanvas, gnomevfs2, pango and libgnomeui from what I've seen after building with 1 day old Marcus ports. I didn't want to recompile whole stuff and have gone like this: libgnome-2.so.792 libgnome-2.so.800 libgnomecanvas-2.so.792 libgnomecanvas-2.so.800 libgnomeui-2.so.792 libgnomeui-2.so.800 libgnomevfs-2.so.792 libgnomevfs-2.so.800 libpango-1.0.so.501 libpango-1.0.so.600 libpangoft2-1.0.so.501 libpangoft2-1.0.so.600 libpangox-1.0.so.501 libpangox-1.0.so.600 libpangoxft-1.0.so.501 libpangoxft-1.0.so.600 But it was a secondary machine and I bet it is not a Good Thing (TM) on a production workstation. -- Piotr Smyrak piotr.smyrak@heron.pl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040916134856.76bcea49>