Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 16:43:34 -0400 From: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> To: Ken Smith <kensmith@cse.Buffalo.EDU> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Xorg Packages on 5.3-beta5 Message-ID: <p0611041dbd7a162eddeb@[128.113.24.47]> In-Reply-To: <20040924055018.GA14539@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> References: <p06110412bd793d4e08bd@[128.113.24.47]> <20040924050018.GA13875@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> <p0611041abd795b5211f2@[128.113.24.47]> <20040924055018.GA14539@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 1:50 AM -0400 9/24/04, Ken Smith wrote: >On Fri, Sep 24, 2004, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > >> And I then went to install ports, the install of cvsup failed. >> Maybe that should be cvsup-without-gui ? (or was it there, and >> I just selected the wrong package? I am tired enough right now >> that I might not have noticed a without-gui package...) > >Sorry but do you mean 'port' (as in building from /usr/ports) or >package (using pkg_add)? If you mean package the disc1 package >set includes cvsup but not cvsup-without-gui. There should have >been a cvsup-without-gui available in /usr/ports to build from. Oops. I really mean "packages", of course, as in the pre-built packages which are included on the CD-ROM. If I were going to build things via ports, I would first want to run cvsup on the ports collection. So it might be nicer to have cvsup-without-gui on the CD's, and not include the package for the full-blown cvsup, just to avoid the dependency on X. -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?p0611041dbd7a162eddeb>