Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 15:26:47 -0300 (ADT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> To: Don Lewis <truckman@FreeBSD.org> Cc: keramida@linux.gr Subject: Re: what is fsck's "slowdown"? Message-ID: <20040928152545.X57211@ganymede.hub.org> In-Reply-To: <200409271718.i8RHIsrP032923@gw.catspoiler.org> References: <200409271718.i8RHIsrP032923@gw.catspoiler.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 27 Sep 2004, Don Lewis wrote: > On 24 Sep, Marc G. Fournier wrote: >> >> Just curious as to whether or not this is going to get applied to the >> source tree ... ? Just checked my -current, and it isn't there yet, just >> wanted to see if maybe its been forgotten? :( > > There are a couple of tweaks that I want to do. My plan is to re-post > the patch to current@ for further testing before I commit it. After it > has had time to be sufficiently exercised in -CURRENT, I'll MFC it to > RELENG_5 (after 5.3-RELEASE), and RELENG_4. The feedback I've gotten > from those who reviewed the patch has been positive, but I want to take > it slow because of the critical nature of fsck. Cool to both points ... especially the MFC back to 4 :) Once its there, I'll definitely do an upgrade on our servers, since that will significantly reduce our downtimes :( Thanks ... ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040928152545.X57211>