Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 12:05:33 +0200 From: Matthias Andree <ma@dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Cc: sos@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Status of 4-STABLE branch. Message-ID: <m3fz4j9bma.fsf@merlin.emma.line.org> In-Reply-To: <20041012171327.GA46089@skatecity> (arundel@h3c.de's message of "Tue, 12 Oct 2004 19:13:27 %2B0200") References: <20041011233035.GA15761@skatecity> <20041012171327.GA46089@skatecity>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
alexander <arundel@h3c.de> writes: > As far as I know there will be another 4.11-RELEASE. Doesn't this mean > that patches should still be comitted to the source tree? > > I reported a problem a few weeks ago. LBA48 support for the Promise > UDMA100 controller (PDC20265) seems to be broken. It's not a big problem > to fix it, because it looks as if some previous patch got abandoned > during a recent version change of some ata files. > > Here's the PR, btw: > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3Dkern/69009 Time to find a new ata maintainer for FreeBSD 4 perhaps? S=F8ren may not have the resources (time, interest, funds) of supporting multiple trees at the same time -- however, leaving the bug open and unassign it would have been the right thing to do. --=20 Matthias Andree Encrypted mail welcome: my GnuPG key ID is 0x052E7D95 (PGP/MIME preferred)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?m3fz4j9bma.fsf>