Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 14 Oct 2004 13:32:24 +0200
From:      Jose M Rodriguez <josemi@freebsd.jazztel.es>
To:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Cc:        Sergei Kolobov <sergei@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: alternative options for ports
Message-ID:  <200410141332.27469.josemi@freebsd.jazztel.es>
In-Reply-To: <200410141321.00808.josemi@freebsd.jazztel.es>
References:  <416C0DE8.3000004@struchtrup.com> <20041014095355.GA61134@elendil.ru> <200410141321.00808.josemi@freebsd.jazztel.es>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
El Jueves, 14 de Octubre de 2004 13:20, Jose M Rodriguez escribi=F3:
> El Jueves, 14 de Octubre de 2004 11:53, Sergei Kolobov escribi=F3:
> > On 2004-10-14 at 00:54 +0200, Sebastian Schulze Struchtrup wrote:
> > > I thought of a way to specify configurations to build several
[ ... ]
> >
> > FLAVOURS=3D gtk kde athena
> >
> > which produces the corresponding vim-gtk, vim-kde, and vim-athena
> > packages from a *signle* port, without a need to create a multitude
> > of slave ports.
> >
> > Is there anybody working to bring this feature in our bsd.port.mk?
> >
> > Sergei
>
> It not so esay.  OpenBSD port system is binary oriented (And I think
> NetBSD pkgsrc also).  Even installing from ports, they make first de
> package and then install.
>

It must say:

It's not so easy.  OpenBSD ports system is binary oriented (like rpm and=20
NetBSD pkgsrc, I think).  Even installing from ports, they make first a=20
package and then install from that.

Well,  seems that caffeine in not enought. Time to bed.

=2D-
  josemi



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200410141332.27469.josemi>