Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 13:47:53 +0200 From: Jonathan Weiss <tomonage2@gmx.de> To: <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: AW: alternative options for ports Message-ID: <BD943409.CB95%tomonage2@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <200410141332.27469.josemi@freebsd.jazztel.es>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> El Jueves, 14 de Octubre de 2004 13:20, Jose M Rodriguez escribi=F3: >> El Jueves, 14 de Octubre de 2004 11:53, Sergei Kolobov escribi=F3: >>> On 2004-10-14 at 00:54 +0200, Sebastian Schulze Struchtrup wrote: >>>> I thought of a way to specify configurations to build several > [ ... ] >>>=20 >>> FLAVOURS=3D gtk kde athena >>>=20 >>> which produces the corresponding vim-gtk, vim-kde, and vim-athena >>> packages from a *signle* port, without a need to create a multitude >>> of slave ports. >>>=20 >>> Is there anybody working to bring this feature in our bsd.port.mk? >>>=20 >>> Sergei >>=20 >> It not so esay. OpenBSD port system is binary oriented (And I think >> NetBSD pkgsrc also). Even installing from ports, they make first de >> package and then install. >>=20 >=20 > It must say: >=20 > It's not so easy. OpenBSD ports system is binary oriented (like rpm and > NetBSD pkgsrc, I think). Even installing from ports, they make first a > package and then install from that. BTW, I like this approach much more! Make a package out of the port and then install it, it is much more meaningful . Also the 'make package' target in OpenBSD does not install the package as i= n FreeBSD, also more meaningful . Greets, Jonathan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BD943409.CB95%tomonage2>